|
 |
Consciousness Reframed 2003
(an)Architecture, Eros, Memory: the Naxsmash Project
Summary.
Consciousness of violence is the negative
ground from which there can be production of an aesthetic. The
experience of building Naxsmash as transmedia performance,
sound and installation, has led to improvisations on presence as
subject and transaction between and “behind” the screen.
Cyberspace as a Lacanian atopia.
Keywords: memoire,
feminine, place, subject, atopia, performance, sexual abuse, trauma,
topology, contemporary art, installation, performance
“We thus enter a universe in which logic
does not at as a guarantee of truth; instead truth acts to guarantee
the comprehensibility of logic (a Heideggerian kind of universe,
then), harnessing the letter into a dialectic whose very openness
is its best guarantee of closure. “La lettre, ça
se lit,” Lacan
writes – but this writing is already read, needs no reading
from us, and is enclosed in pure self-affection…..With
this the prospect of metalanguage collapses, leaving in its stead
a problem of imitation and a vision of psychoanalysis as only infinitely
prospective and subjunctive science…adequately described as
pas-tout, its truth elusively and familiarly figured as woman, everywhere
and nowhere, not-all" [1].
1 subject and place
To begin with, a short story: a
phenomenology, of an installation.
At the entrance, a dark
space. Within are suspended a forest of dark, long, transparent scrims. It’s
difficult to avoid touching them. You must negotiate them as you
pass through. Inside, lcd projectors arranged in a transverse triangle
emit sound and light through scrims, illuminating and interrupting
surfaces and image. The sound has recursive structures, so that it
seems to propel itself within, around, and through the internal spaces
generated by the scrims. The music turns itself upside-down,
inverts itself, slips and falls, and insistently gets back up again
as a fugue interaction with the physical space.
Once inside,
you obstruct video projection and hear the sound from moving points.
Light and image project through your movements and onto your skin.
As you enter your reaction and response to the assault of light and
sound mediates the presence of the scrims; it activates them as a
layering of screens. In reaction to your entrance or non-entrance,
to your engagement or non-engagement, to response, the next thing
you do or do not do, is performance. Now not only your own screen
and audience, but you are also the audience for others’ bodies-as-screens.
There is, within this space, if you want it, an ungrounded experience
to take place, even at the same moment that you experience the groundedness
produced by the experience of your own, conscious, intentional behaviors
and choices. It is, in short, a constructed experience of the
Uncanny, or, in Lacanian terms, an eruption of the Real.
Detail, transparent scrim, Naxsmash suite, digital print on duraclear
The
scrims are not empty film, waiting for exposure: there is something
upon them. What seems to be on or in them would appear to be
still or photographic images, but it is not clear to you that they
are in fact photographs. They are saturated, with streaks of
orange and red in rope-like strands. Here and there, you can
perceive the image of a woman—or parts of her: her hands, her
eyes. It seems to be a figure that’s locked up, trapped
somehow within or behind the scrims and cannot fully be seen, but
she gives you the impression that she is not only seeing you, she
is looking at you. The videos also seem to have something to
do with this woman moving within the narrow, hollow projections of
light. Her face and flashes of her body appear and disappear, in
layers. The gaze of a double, her tied up hands, her breathing,
moves through the scrims.
You are aware of the communal aspect
of your isolation that arises from your awareness of the other bodies
reflecting and refracting among the labyrinths of scrim. There is
a seductive quality to the violence of the experience in that you
know that it is not merely yourself and the screen engaged in this
ebb and flow of light, sound, and movement. You experience
also, however anonymously, a sense of community with the other disembodied,
reflective, severed bodies within the space. You are each of
you not only illuminated, spot-lit as it were: you are also comfortingly
anonymous in your experience of dis- and re-embodiment, so that you
are not only alienated by your experience but you are also, by virtue
of the shared aspects of your experience, given permission to enjoy
the strangeness, to breathe freely for awhile in “eine Fremde”,
a strange land, as Kafka writes of his protagonist K, when K loses
control and finding himself breathing for a period of hours in the
arms of a woman he does not know [2]
2 feminine and memoire
The story of this breathing space is
Naxsmash, a multimedia performance project now three years into the
making.
NAXSmash comes from NAX, and subsequent performance works in the
series “Memoires of a Cyborg.” NAX involved rediscovery
of a site of childhood violence. The name is shorthand for Lake Nacimiento,
a place I had long searched for and finally found. I wanted to go
to this lake and make a performance video as a way of getting in
touch with the traumatic memory at the site of violence. The video
documents an act of breathing as if to contain and release traumatic
memory from the site. Memory is the recognition or storage
of events; memoire is narration of memory. The video was not memoire,
because my performance did not tell a story. All I did was,
practically nothing: an act almost negligent, and subtle, just breathing.
Saving
files, I typed “nacimiento” then “nascent” then “nax”. “X” marked
the place, but where was it? Nowhere but inside the digital video
edits, via erasure and inscription. Smashing the violence through
the recovery and digitalizing of a violent memory inscribes the memory
in a realm that has no location outside the digital object itself. Concealed
in a pun, my “x,” factor spliced X as the sign
of the feminine inside the media space, as if violated by continuous
and limitless edits. I noticed a shift: what had happened to
the feminine x, the spot where I was or am, the location of the subject? I
was gone, baby, gone. I became witness to my own disappearance.
Transposing performance in a new key, in streaming online, in Flash,
in installation, in hypertext, I lost track of narrative space. What
was there instead? The hallucinatory and decentered aura of the media
space was interesting because it was permeated by presence.. As
if they were there somewhere below or behind the screen wanting to
express themselves, decentered subjects moved into the subjunctive
mood. In English, we say, “if we are to go somewhere”,
if “you were to come here” – a transactional, formalized
ambiguity. The subjunctive mood became a virtual memoire.
It is a bit like old times in those high school nights, when “ everybody
knows” or better, what if “if everybody were to know” that
there is some girl who is always getting fucked, night after night,
behind the bleachers at the school football game. Then what? She
is there but we really can’t, or won’t see her; she gazes
at us in a dematerialized pathos without a story to tell because
we are not present to her, to hear her; she is just some girl. I
noticed the breathing action by the girl in my video was not ‘me’. She
was submerged or hidden in the pixels. Violent memory I had released
into a cyber spatial transaction, but the memoire of that memory
was there and not there. Like the raped girl I could not ‘see’ myself
or ‘hear myself’ in the performance work. I shifted
to a position of working performatively as a cyborg.
3 performance atopia
I built online streaming
worlds and live installation out of this position: my consciousness
was reframed as object inside the media space. From this position
I could work powerfully. I witnessed a new fluency in my sound art,
digital stills and time-based media. The work was flowing from
a decentered subject, i.e, as I had found a formalized way to sound
out story, to make music and image without repression, because “I” was
nowhere to be found. In my real life, one of the aftereffects
of trauma, is silence and hiding. One does not want to be seen
because one fears being hurt again. By shifting across the ambiguous
space, from the paralysis and silence of memory of rape, into the
mediated double of self on and in the screen, I gathered momentum. I
now could make work as a series of processional moments out of this
traumatized consciousness. Between violence and sublimity and between
a subjective presencing and human interactivity, I built cyber spatial
narratives as cuts, or smashes, between layers of ambiguous screen. Like
pointing to a topology behind, or beyond the screen, the phenomenology
of presence generated exactly from atopia, from formal transformations
in digital media, none of which imitate anything we can know. There
is nothing there behind the bleachers at the football game. Just
code. But it feels real, and that is the interesting part. Because
it feels real, it becomes active as a topology.
This position, from within the atopic ground, is paradoxically, negative. It
is marked (or stained, to use a favorite Lacanian cliché)
by “x” – amusingly, also the chromosome that
if doubled, produces female sexual beings. With Lacan we can say
that it is feminine, as in ‘not-all’ and ‘everywhere’.
From the impossible oxymoron of ‘woman artist’, I have
disappeared like the NAX girl into the oxygenated pixels. Inside,
my breathing is a consciousness reframed by the edge of the screen The
consciousness is an active viral force field, ‘pas-tout’ and ‘partout’.
This means that I cut through the spaces between everywhere and nowhere. My
artistic work performs as if it is of jouissance, the excess, the
erotic ‘too much’ beyond the frame or scrim or
screen. Just move along the edges of the images, tracing the change. At
the end of the day one is still left with the screen, but one has
invested itself, and oneself with memory, or rather, memoires, of
what was experienced in the mediated, ‘naxsmashed’ space.
Topology, the logic of place, meets its end as its beginning in the
condition of cyberspace as a single surface twisted into a continuous,
meta—temporal, reflexive process, a mobius strip. Lacan describes
the move/countermove that always ends at the same no – place:
Chest law queue le reel new saurian sincere
queue dune impasse de la formalization…Cite formalization mathématique de
la signifance se fait au contraire du sens, j’allais presque
dire à contre-sens,
It is thus that the real is distinguished. The real cannot
be inscribed except as an impasse of formalization…. This
mathematical formalization of signification is accomplished against
the grain of sense – I very nearly said, a contre sense—the
wrong way, by interpretation, absurdly (The real in them of its ‘fullness’ and “that
which always comes back to the same place.” The apparent
invocation of place amounts in fact to the eradication of the notion
of place itself (“There is no topology that does not have to
be supported by some artifice.”)” [3]
The object, the NAX girl, is a shadowy presence in the Naxsmash spaces,
both online and in installation. Signals of an entrapped being, she
inflects the screen, her motility membrane, like a skin or gut wall,
through which she utters a breath of scattered speech. This utterance,
suggested through the presence of electronically remixed –and
shattered—passages of voice and keyboard, loops back from the
point of its origin as an oblique narrative about trauma and violent
memory, to return, as its point of origin, as mediated displacements.
She cannot be evoked except through the no-place of digital media
where she exists nowhere and everywhere, inaccessible and yet full
of observable gestures whose significance we invest, or divest, with
memoires and desires.
 |
| |
[1] Melville, S., 1996. Psychoanalysis and
the Place of Jouissance. In Seams: Art as a Philosophical Context. Amsterdam:
G+B Arts International, p. 105.
[2] Kafka, F., Underwood,
J. A., transl., 1997, The Castle. London: Penguin Books, p.
38. “Then she started up, K. having remained lost in thought,
and began to tug at him like a child: ‘Come, it’s suffocating
under here,’ they embraced, the little body burning in K.’s
hands, in a state of oblivion from which K. tried repeatedly yet
vainly to extricate himself they rolled several steps, thudded into
Klamm’s door, then lay in the little puddles of beer and the
rest of the rubbish covering the floor. There hours passed, hours
of breathing as one, heart beating as one, hours in which K. constantly
had the feeling that he had lost his way or wandered farther into
a strange land, than anyone before him, a strange land where even
the air held no trace of the air at home, where a man must suffocate
from the strangeness yet into whose foolish enticements he could
do nothing but plunge, on, getting even more lost.” This passage
is performed online in my slipstreamandromeda http://www.naxsmash.net/slip/index.html
[3]
Melville, S., ibid., p. 106. |
| |
|
 |
|